The Trouble with Einstein

In 1912 Albert met Paul Ehrenfest, a physicist and teacher of compatible brilliance.  Five years later, Ehrenfest had a son named Vassik born with Downs Syndrome, who in 1932 was institutionalized.  By way of comfort, Albert told him, “Valuable individuals must not be sacrificed to hopeless things.”  This position was consistent with Albert’s refusal to marry Mileva when she was pregnant and then delivered Lieserl, called by some who knew the family secret a “monstrosity.”  When their second son was afflicted with manic-depression, Albert abandoned the family.

 

As despicable as I find his abandonment, it remains an unsettled issue for me, as when I consider the pastor in Florida‘s pain over his severely autistic son whose disability affects the whole family in such drastic ways.  I remember mother once saying that my classmate Susan was spending all her resources on a disabled baby and denying privileges to her two children who were actually capable of benefiting.  I’m against disabled children being mainstreamed and allowed to consume inordinate amounts of teacher attention/energy, so that the easily-educable children are denied.  So how is this different from Einstein’s position, as despicable as I find it on the page?  I’m also aware that if I were in the situation with my own child, it would no longer remain an intellectual question.  Like Mileva, I would feel committed to see it through, though even she abandoned Lieserl to her parents’ farm and went to Bern to marry Albert.  Ultimately, however, she died a grim, resentful woman, having beggered her emotional and financial resources to a lost cause.  How does this relate to a phrase I’ve heard myself speak to women who have allowed caretaking for elderly or mentally-ill relatives to use them up?  I ask them, “How many disabled people is better than one?”  But I don’t think I mean for them to abandon their loved one.  Rather to tell them it’s good (not bad, as they’ve been made to feel) to enlist support services, even if it means moving the person from the home. 

 

This being an unsettled issue is likely a point in its favor, just as the open-endedness of my position on faith vs science in the Darwin book made it a discovery process.  It’s really a moral problem. 

Posted in Darwin, Einstein, Einstein's children, family members, writing | 1 Comment

The World as Einstein Sees It

Albert Einstein wrote a memoir at the end of his life called The World As I See It.  This, his life story, contains no mention of either wife, Mileva or Elsa, or his children–not even the two he acknowledged, Hans Albert and Eduard, never mind the daughter Lieserl, born to Mileva before their marriage.  Instead, with pride he proclaims the necessity of casting off the “chains of the merely personal.”

Am I to bind him back to to those from whom he wished to be liberated?  How is it possible to be independent of personal influences?  Why does a person want to be?

Posted in writing | Leave a comment

What about Einstein?

As I approach the end of the Darwin book, I feel that angst about beginning something new.  I’ve been reading, searching for the next book, uncertain whether I want to write about another scientist. Last night I finished a book on Einstein called Einstein’s Daughter, by Michele Zackheim.  He had a daughter, Lieserl, who went missing, a baby who was mysteriously hidden, thanks to her having been born before Einstein married the baby’s mother.  The circumstances are peculiar, and all records of this birth–birth certificate, baptismal records, have conveniently disappeared.  The reference to the baby’s existence came to light in the love letters between Einstein and Mileva Maric–a Serbian whose brilliance in physics made her an appropriate companion to Einstein when they met in school.  So, why didn’t he  marry her when she got pregnant?  That’s the mystery.  He waited.  He married her later.  Meanwhile, she had to leave school and hide on her family’s estate, with the baby, whom she subsequently left to return to Bern, to marry Einstein.  The love letter says this:

“I am very sorry about what has befallen Lieserl.  It’s so easy to suffer lasting effects from scarlet fever.  If only this will pass.  As what is the child registered?  We must take precaustions that problems don’t arise for her later…”

The few relations who knew anything about Lieserl and were eventually convinced to speak, referred to her as a monstrosity or a mongoloid baby, and after Zackheim explored four adult women, one of whom claimed to be his daughter and the others whom Zackheim had reason to believe might be Lieserl, Zackheim concludes that Lieserl did indeed die in early childhood of scarlet fever, likely an afflicted baby from the start.

There’s an interesting side note to all this.  Darwin’s last baby, Charles Waring, was likely a Downs syndrome child and died of scarlet fever in 1858.  His diagnosis is based on photographs of the child and Darwin’s observations of his development, because there was no diagnosis for this condition in 1858.  Nonetheless, researchers feel quite certain this is the correct conclusion.

So, does that synchonicity attract me to Einstein?  There are other factors I need to sort out.  But they are subjects in themselves–disturbing ideas, which are in themselves moral issues.

And then there’s the simple question:  Do I like this man (Albert Einstein) well enough to spend 2-3 years in his presence?  In his head?  And what of Mileva?  Can I live with her?

During this process of research, framing a conflict, and then waiting for the scenes to form in my mind, I become minutely familiar with the person’s failings.  In the case of Darwin, while I see him as a weak and sometimes selfish man, he has many qualities I admire and I found him easy to love.  From what I’ve read of Einstein, I’m not certain that can happen.  But more on that later.

Posted in writing | 1 Comment

In the beginning …

I’m realizing how hard it is to begin, not just a blog, but any bit of writing.  It feels too big, like it needs to be important what I have to say, or why say it, and why not do something else instead?  It seems that I should begin with a mission statement, why I feel the need to do this at all, or what the blog name means, what writing and faith have to do with one another.  Hopefully, I’ll get to that, but for today, I need merely to put something down and not worry if it’s meaningful in any way except to say that it’s happened–as in there, I did it.  I began.

Posted in writing | Leave a comment

In the beginning …

I’m realizing how hard it is to begin, not just a blog, but any bit of writing.  It feels too big, like it needs to be important what I have to say, or why say it, and why not do something else instead?  It seems that I should begin with a mission statement, why I feel the need to do this at all, or what the blog name means, what writing and faith have to do with one another.  Hopefully, I’ll get to that, but for today, I need merely to put something down and not worry if it’s meaningful in any way except to say that it’s happened–as in there, I did it.  I began.

Posted in writing | 1 Comment